Resources/one pagers Archives

NCUIH Releases New Resource Highlighting Medicaid’s Crucial Role for American Indian and Alaska Native Communities

March 25, 2025/in Policy Blog, Resources/one pagers/by Meredith Raimondi

The National Council of Urban Indian Health (NCUIH) has released a comprehensive overview highlighting the crucial role Medicaid plays in providing health care to American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. This report emphasizes the importance of preserving Medicaid resources and exempting AI/AN beneficiaries from work requirements to fulfill the federal government’s trust responsibility.

Access the Resource

Approximately 2.7 million AI/AN people are enrolled in Medicaid, with 24% of AI/AN adults aged 18-64 and 23% of those over 64 benefiting from the program.
Almost 49% of AI/AN children are enrolled in Medicaid.
Urban Indian Organizations serve as vital health care providers.
- 59% of AI/AN people receiving care at UIOs are Medicaid beneficiaries.
- Eight out of the top ten states with the largest number of AI/AN Medicaid beneficiaries have UIOs providing essential services.

Call to Action

Preserve Medicaid Resources

Cuts to Medicaid would severely impact AI/AN health care access, necessitating state funding gaps and reducing essential services like diabetes programming and cancer screenings.

Exempt AI/AN Beneficiaries from Work Requirements:

Mandatory work requirements would disproportionately affect AI/AN beneficiaries due to unique economic challenges. Exemption is crucial to protect health care access, consistent with the Indian Health Care Improvement Act.

Percentage of American Indian and Alaska Native Population on Medicaid by State and Age Range:

Below is a table of Medicaid data for the AI/AN population, based on the American Community Survey data (2023, 1-year estimate).

State	0-18 % of AI/AN Pop on Medicaid	19 – 64 % of AI/AN Pop on Medicaid	65+ % of AI/AN Pop on Medicaid
Alabama	58.84	14.97	22.11
Alaska	55.85	36.74	33.21
Arizona	48.31	29.57	30.78
Arkansas	47.24	23.11	16.94
California	47.16	26.66	26.25
Colorado	49.51	26.06	27.58
Connecticut	44.46	37.48	19.05
Delaware	56.56	21.19	20.40
District of Columbia	31.99	4.85	24.97
Florida	39.17	13.3	20.23
Georgia	44.67	12.10	16.88
Hawaii	44.49	25.28	20.44
Idaho	29.99	23.67	15.58
Illinois	47.78	19.71	17.96
Indiana	46.63	28.09	23.48
Iowa	54.32	23.95	19.33
Kansas	39.11	14.84	19.97
Kentucky	61.44	32.86	23.60
Louisiana	50.16	28.86	22.90
Maine	62.81	36.51	29.80
Maryland	40.43	17.56	19.58
Massachusetts	51.09	37.18	41.82
Michigan	47.32	29.74	16.24
Minnesota	50.35	32.43	14.18
Mississippi	65.29	14.60	26.81
Missouri	55.78	20.56	19.62
Montana	68.30	42.37	26.44
Nebraska	52.94	25.51	28.72
Nevada	41.06	22.72	19.65
New Hampshire	51.70	24.62	35.66
New Jersey	57.23	19.83	10.63
New Mexico	71.65	43.62	35.09
New York	49.32	30.94	33.53
North Carolina	57.28	21.29	23.66
North Dakota	63.34	37.79	17.69
Ohio	46.73	27.70	27.55
Oklahoma	51.42	21.62	17.18
Oregon	59.71	33.21	25.83
Pennsylvania	50.85	32.67	30.96
Rhode Island	46.77	25.63	16.85
South Carolina	40.89	18.65	18.50
South Dakota	60.30	26.67	30.01
Tennessee	51.66	22.20	22.64
Texas	35.10	9.37	16.87
Utah	29.98	20.95	18.67
Vermont	73.74	33.13	24.74
Virginia	37.40	21.24	13.27
Washington	49.27	27.90	18.98
West Virginia	45.81	32.73	10.62
Wisconsin	53.46	27.34	15.72
Wyoming	52.42	19.57	15.07
All States + DC	48.68	24.22	22.97

REPORT: Urban Indian Health at Risk – Federal Funding Disruptions Threaten Critical Services

February 3, 2025/in Policy Blog, Resources/one pagers/by Meredith Raimondi

Today, February 3, 2025, the National Council of Urban Indian Health (NCUIH) releases a critical report on the potential impact of federal funding disruptions on Urban Indian Organizations (UIOs). This timely survey highlights the importance of these vital healthcare providers serving American Indians and Alaska Natives in urban areas across the United States.

Key Findings

Operational Sustainability: Over half of the surveyed UIOs report they would be unable to sustain operations beyond six months without federal funding. Alarmingly, some organizations can only maintain services for 30 days or less, underscoring the immediate threat to these essential healthcare providers.
Workforce Instability: More than 60% of UIOs face potential staff reductions, with 23.1% definitely needing to furlough or lay off staff if federal funding is disrupted. This threatens not only the livelihoods of dedicated healthcare professionals but also the continuity of care for urban Native communities.
Service Discontinuation: A significant number of UIOs anticipate discontinuing critical services if federal funding is disrupted.
- These at-risk services include:
  - Primary care
  - Behavioral health services
  - Substance abuse treatment
  - Community wellness initiatives
  - Health programs (vaccinations, testing, education)
  - Cultural and youth programming

Implications

The potential disruption of UIO services could have far-reaching consequences for urban American Indian and Alaska Native populations. UIOs serve patients from over 500 federally recognized Tribes, providing crucial primary care, behavioral health, traditional medicine, and social services. Any interruption in these services could exacerbate existing health disparities and undermine decades of progress in urban Native healthcare.

As we release this report, we call on policymakers, healthcare leaders, and advocates to recognize the critical role of UIOs in the Indian health system and take immediate action to ensure their continued operation and funding stability. The health and well-being of urban Native communities depend on the uninterrupted services provided by these organizations.

Report

IMPACT OF FEDERAL FUNDING PAUSES ON URBAN INDIAN ORGANIZATIONS

Resource: Data on Infant and Maternal Health Disparities in Native Communities

October 13, 2022/0 Comments/in Policy Blog, Resources/one pagers/by Meredith Raimondi

The National Council of Urban Indian Health (NCUIH) recently released an infographic showcasing data on infant and maternal health disparities in American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities. Unfortunately, AI/AN communities throughout the country, including urban AI/AN communities, experience significant maternal and infant health disparities compared to the general population.

View the resource

AI/AN Infant and Maternal Health Disparities

A report by the National Center for Health Statistics noted that between 2005 and 2014, American Indian/Alaska Native was the only racial or ethnic group that did not experience a decline in infant mortality.[1]

Urban AI/AN Infant and Maternal Health Disparities

Over half of urban Indian organizations (UIOs) provide care for maternal health, infant health, prenatal, and/or family planning. A study of Natives in UIO service areas found that while birth rates, in general, were lower in the urban Native population (12.8 and 16.5 per 1,000 population, respectively), premature birth rates for both urban and non-urban AI/AN were higher than those of all other races and ethnicities combined (12.3% of live births among AI/AI in urban areas and 10.9% among the general population in the same area).[2]

Contributing Factors to AI/AN Infant and Maternal Health Disparities

Cost, discrimination, and lack of cultural competency are all contributing factors to the stark infant and maternal health disparities among AI/ANs.
41% of AI/AN women cite cost as a barrier to receiving the recommended number of prenatal visits.[3]
- AI/AN women are 3-4x more likely to begin prenatal care in the third trimester.[4]
21% of AI/AN women ages 15-44 are uninsured, compared to 8% of white women.[5]
23% of AI/ANs report they have faced discrimination in clinical settings due to being an AI/AN.[6]
- 15% report avoiding medical care for themselves or family members due to fear of discrimination.[7]
Access to culturally appropriate care can be difficult for AI/ANs living in urban areas, as most IHS clinics and hospitals, as well as Tribal healthcare facilities, are located on reservations.[8]

UIO and NCUIH work in AI/AN Infant and Maternal Mortality

UIOs provide a range of services such as primary care, behavioral health, traditional, and social services— including those for infants, children, and mothers. At least 23 of these clinics provide care for maternal health, infant health, prenatal, and/or family planning. They also provide pediatric services and participate in maternal-child care programs such as WIC and the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting program (MIECHV).

NCUIH has engaged in extensive advocacy on behalf of AI/AN mothers and infants and for increased funding and support to the UIOs which provide maternal health, infant health, prenatal, and family planning services to AI/AN mothers and infants. On March 9, 2022, NCUIH signed on to a letter to Congress led by the National Home Visiting Coalition in support of reauthorizing HRSA’s Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program (MIECHV) and doubling the Tribal set-aside— which includes UIOs.

Also, in March, NCUIH submitted comments to the HRSA Advisory Committee on Infant and Maternal Mortality (ACIMM), which advises the Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) on department activities, partnerships, policies, and programs directed at reducing infant mortality, maternal mortality and severe maternal morbidity, and improving the health status of infants and women before, during, and after pregnancy. In August, NCUIH submitted comments to HRSA’s Maternal and Child Health Bureau (MCHB) regarding the Pediatric Mental Health Care Access Program in August. In our comments, we have continued to stress the critical importance of including urban Natives populations in HRSA’s overall efforts of improving health outcomes for all AI/ANs living on and off reservations.

On September 14, 2022, NCUIH’s Vice President of Public Policy, Meredith Raimondi, testified before the HRSA ACIMM on urban Indian disparities and policy changes to address these disparities. Raimondi highlighted that “over half of urban Indian health centers provide care for maternal health, infant health, prenatal, and/or family planning. However, due to chronic underfunding, many of these health centers only have the capacity to carry out these services for the early stages of pregnancy.” She continued to say, “despite desiring to do so, many urban Indian health clinics cannot expand their services to provide complete care for mothers and infants from conception to birth due to underfunding.” Raimondi provided the following recommendations to the Advisory Committee:

Reauthorize MIECHV at a higher amount and double the Tribal set-aside from 3% to 6%.
ACIMM and other stakeholders should collaborate with UIOs to gather critical and accurate information on urban AI/AN populations.
Advise the HHS Secretary to lead the establishment of an urban confer policy across all HHS agencies.
Include a Tribal and UIO health provider representative on the ACIMM and create an ACIMM subcommittee dedicated to addressing AI/AN infant and maternal health disparities.

[1] Mathews TJ, Driscoll AK, Trends in infant mortality in the United States, 2005–2014, (2017) available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db279.pdf

[2]Castor ML, Smyser MS, Taualii MM, Park AN, Lawson SA, Forquera RA. “A nationwide population-based study identifying health disparities between American Indians/ Alaska Natives and the general populations living in select urban counties.” Am J Public Health, 2006;96(5)

[3] National Partnership for Women and Families, American Indian and Alaska Native Women’s Maternal Health: Addressing the Crisis, (2019), https://www. nationalpartnership.org/our-work/resources/health-care/maternity/american-indian-and-alaska.pdf

[4] Urban Indian Health Institute, Community Health Profile: National Aggregate of Urban Indian Health Program Service Areas, (2016), http://www.uihi.org/wp-content/ uploads/2017/08/UIHI_CHP_2016_Electronic_20170825.pdf

[5] National Partnership for Women and Families, American Indian and Alaska Native Women Face Pervasive disparities in Access to Health Insurance, (2019), https:// www.nationalpartnership.org/our-work/resources/health-care/AIAN-health-insurance-coverage.pdf

[6] Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Poll finds more than one-third of Native Americans report slurs, violence, harassment, and being discriminated against in the workplace (2017), https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/news/press-releases/poll-native-americans-discrimination/

[7] Id.

[8] See Mental Health America, Native and Indigenous Communities and Mental Health – Prevalence, https://www.mhanational.org/issues/native-and-indigenouscommunities-and-mental-health (last accessed Aug. 20, 2022).

Resources: Timeline of Advocacy and History on Advance Appropriations for the Indian Health Service

August 22, 2022/0 Comments/in Policy Blog, Resources/one pagers/by BSchmoyer

The National Council of Urban Indian Health (NCUIH) released a document on the history of advance appropriations for the Indian Health Service (IHS), which explains the necessity of advance appropriations and provides a timeline on the advocacy, congressional and federal support, and legislative efforts since 2013. The Indian healthcare system, including IHS, Tribal facilities, and urban Indian organizations (UIOs), is the only major federal healthcare provider funded through annual appropriations.

Unfortunately, discretionary budget funding for IHS is repeatedly delayed. Since Fiscal Year (FY) 1996, there has only been one occurrence of timely funding, and that was in FY 2006.

View the resource

View the timeline

Advance appropriations has been a priority for Indian Country for years and we have seen broad support on this issue from Native health advocates. Over the past 10 years, there have been five resolutions in support of advance appropriations from the United South and Eastern Tribes (USET), the Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes (ITC), the National Indian Health Board (NIHB), the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI), and the American Bar Association. On January 17, 2019, NCUIH sent a letter to the Vice Chairman of the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs (SCIA), Tom Udall, in support of IHS advance appropriations legislation. On March 9, 2022, NCUIH joined NIHB and over 70 Tribal nations and national Indian organizations in sending a series of joint letters to Congress requesting advance appropriations for IHS in the FY 2022 omnibus. and on June 16, 2022, NIHB and NCAI requested that the Committee support and include IHS advance appropriations in the current FY 2023 appropriations bill in an action alert. Most recently, NCUIH sent letters to Speaker Pelosi, House Minority Leader McCarthy, Senate Majority Leader Schumer, Senate Minority Leader McConnell, Senate Interior Appropriations Committee, and SCIA to support advance appropriations for IHS.

In 2013, the United South and Eastern Tribes, Inc. passed a resolution in support of advance appropriations for IHS.
In 2014, the Inter-Tribal Council of the Five Civilized Tribes passed Resolution No. 14-05 requesting advance appropriations for IHS.
In 2014, the National Indian Health Board (NIHB) passed Resolution 14-03 to support advance appropriations for IHS.
In 2019, the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) passed Resolution 19-001 to support advance appropriations for the Bureau of Indian Affairs and IHS.
In 2019, the American Bar Association passed a resolution urging Congress to enact advance appropriations legislation for IHS.
On March 9, 2022, NCUIH joined NIHB and over 70 Tribal nations and national Indian organizations in sending a series of joint letters to Congress requesting advance appropriations for IHS in the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 omnibus.
On June 16, 2022, NIHB and NCAI requested that the Committee support and include IHS advance appropriations in the current FY 2023 appropriations bill in an action alert.
On June 24, 2022, NCUIH sent a letter to Speaker Pelosi to support advance appropriations for IHS.
On June 30 and July 1, 2022 NCUIH sent letters to Senate Majority Leader Schumer and Senate Minority Leader McConnell to support advance appropriations for IHS

There has also been strong long-standing support from Congress on this issue. On January 12, 2022, the Native American Caucus sent a letter to House Appropriations Committee Chair DeLauro and Ranking Member Granger requesting that advance appropriations for IHS for FY 2023 be included in the final FY 2022 appropriations bill, and again on June 3 requesting that, while the process of shifting IHS to mandatory appropriations is underway, advanced appropriations for IHS be included in the final FY 2023 Appropriations bill. On April 25, 2022, a bipartisan group of 28 Representatives requested up to $949.9 million for urban Indian health in FY 2023 and advance appropriations for IHS until such time that authorizers move IHS to mandatory spending, and 12 Senators sent a letter with the same requests. Last year, for the first time ever, the Senate Appropriations Committee included an additional $6.58 billion in advance appropriations to IHS for FY 2023 in its FY 2022 Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies bill.

Back in 2014, SCIA held its first hearing on advance appropriation bill Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act of 2013 (S. 1570). In a House Natural Resources Subcommittee for Indigenous Peoples (SCIP) hearing held during the last Congress on advance appropriations bills H.R. 1128 and H.R. 1135, former IHS Principal Deputy Director, Rear Admiral Michael Weahkee, reaffirmed Indian Country’s repeated request for advance appropriations stating that “[t]hrough the IHS’s robust annual Tribal Budget Consultation process, Tribal and Urban Indian Organization leaders have repeatedly and strongly recommended advance appropriations for the IHS as an essential means for ensuring continued access to critical health care services. The Department continues to hear directly from tribes advocating support for legislative language that would provide the authority of advance appropriations for the IHS. The issues that Tribes have identified present real challenges in Indian Country and we are eager to work with Congress on a variety of solutions.” Most recently on July 28, SCIP held a hearing on the Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act (H.R. 5549) where IHS Acting Deputy Director Elizabeth Fowler reaffirmed IHS’s support for advance appropriations stating that “We remain firmly committed to improving quality, safety, and access to health care for American Indians and Alaskan Natives. Mandatory funding and advanced appropriations are necessary and critical steps toward that goal… [I] urge the House to act on advanced appropriations through the appropriations process with or without the authorizing legislation that is the subject of this hearing.”

The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report from 2018, “Broken Promises: Continuing Federal Funding Shortfall for Native Americans” serves as another benchmark of support by including advance appropriations for IHS as a key recommendation to the federal government to ensure greater funding stability for IHS.

Since 2013, legislation on this effort has been introduced in 11 bills:

10/2013 – Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act of 2013 (R. 3229/S. 1570) o Sponsor: Rep. Don Young/Sen. Lisa Murkowski
1/2015 – Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act of 2015 (R. 395) o Sponsor: Rep. Don Young
1/2017 – Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act of 2017 (R. 235) o Sponsor: Rep. Don Young
2/2019 – Indian Programs Advanced Appropriations Act (R. 1128/S. 229) o Sponsor: Rep. Betty McCollum/Sen. Tom Udall
2/2019 – Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act of 2019 (R. 1135/S. 2541) o Sponsor: Rep. Don Young/Sen. Lisa Murkowski
10/2021 – Indian Health Service Advance Appropriations Act (R. 5549) o Sponsor: Rep. Don Young
10/2021 – Indian Programs Advance Appropriations Act of 2021 (R. 5567/S. 2985) o Sponsor: Rep. Betty McCollum/Sen. Ben Ray Lujan

NCUIH has persistently advocated for advance appropriations for IHS by sending letters to Congress and creating educational materials describing the necessity of this important issue impacting Indian Country.

Government Shutdowns Disproportionately Impact UIOS

During the recent SCIP, IHS Acting Director Liz Fowler testified that UIOs are disproportionally impacted by government shutdowns. She stated, “Urban Indian Organizations (UIO) are funded through a different mechanism than our tribal programs. They’re funded through contracts and grants and the contracts are federal acquisition regulation contracts.” She highlighted that, unlike tribal programs, UIOs are unable to get full funding during continuing resolutions (CR).

View the Testimony Here.

Advance Appropriations Save Native Lives

On July 28, 2022, NCUIH recently released a short video showcasing why advance appropriations is critical to insulate IHS, UIOs, and other Tribal health facilities from the negative consequences engendered by delayed funding when there are government shutdowns, automatic sequestration cuts, and continuing resolutions. The video calls on Congress to enact advance appropriations to prevent the loss of American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) lives by detailing the difficult circumstances resulting from the most recent government shutdown that began at the start of FY 2019, which lasted 35 days. Kerry Lessard, Executive director of the Native American LifeLines of Baltimore, described the experience of her UIO, citing that “We were several months without being paid and that meant services that we had to deny” during the FY2019 shutdown. The impact on AI/ANs was severe, as the Native American Lifelines of Baltimore received seven overdose patients after they were forced to close their doors, five of which were fatal.

View the Video Here.